πŸ•ΈοΈ Legal Topology Explorer

Small-World Network Analysis of Czech Civil Court Decisions

πŸ” Search Decisions πŸ“š Browse by Category πŸ›οΈ Court Analytics πŸ‘¨β€βš–οΈ Judge Analytics
βš–οΈ
-
Court Decisions
πŸ‘¨β€βš–οΈ
-
Judges
πŸ›οΈ
-
Courts
πŸ“œ
-
Statutes
πŸ”—
-
Citations
βœ…
-
Plaintiff Success
🏷️
-
Statutes Classified
πŸ“‹
-
Provision Categories
πŸ“‚
-
Legal Categories
πŸ‘‘
-
Case Citations
βš–οΈ
-
Supreme Court Cites
🌟
-
Landmark Precedents

πŸ‘‘ Supreme Court Influence Analysis

Mapping precedent cascades through Czech judiciary: 1,033 specialized precedents identified across 4,104 decisions citing both case law and substantive statutes.

-
Private Law Precedents
-
Public Law Precedents
96%
Private Law Specialization

🌟 Top Landmark Precedents

    πŸ”· Precedent Specialization

    πŸ“Š Most Cited Statutes

    πŸ‘¨β€βš–οΈ Most Active Judges

      πŸ“ˆ Decisions Timeline

      πŸ›οΈ Most Active Courts

        πŸ“‚ Category Coverage

        🏷️ Top Legal Categories

          πŸ•ΈοΈ Network Visualization Interactive - Click & Drag

          Legend: ● Decisions (clickable) | ● Statutes | ● Supreme Court Precedents
          Showing 100 decisions, 50 statutes, and 30 top precedents. Node size = citation frequency. Click nodes to view details.